Colleagues, those of us in the
technology or financial services sectors know that product delays are common.
The Cryptocurrency Academy applauds ICE’s move to postpone Bakkt’s launch until late January 2019 for
the primary purpose of due diligence and quality control. ICE fully
acknowledges that Bitcoin futures are “commodities” (and not
“securities”) which must be refreshing news to the US
CFTC. Bakkt will set
the price in a one-day physically settled Bitcoin
futures contract. The billion-dollar question is what impact this delay will
have on cryptocurrency futures trading in general and Bitcoin prices in particular.
Bakkt is a strategic and high visibility launch for the global cryptocurrency
ecosystem. ICE is determined to get it right. The implications of a
faulty Bakkt platform launch would have major repercussions. We deem this delay
to be for all the right reasons, however, if it is pushed into February or
March institutional investor confidence will be heavily eroded. Share a comment today! Lawrence – Cryptocurrency
Academy (https://cryptocurrencyacademy.blogspot.com/)
Our mission is to provide Training and Certification programs to enable Cryptocurrency, Blockchain and FinTech traders and investors worldwide to achieve their career goals.
Monday, November 26, 2018
Tuesday, November 20, 2018
What is the fate of cryptocurrency derivatives?
Colleagues, cryptocurrency ETFs, Exchange-Traded
Notes (ETNs), Futures Contracts and Swaps have drawn the scrutiny and ire of
regulatory bodies … particularly in England and the US. A key factor is whether
cryptocurrencies are categorized as securities or commodities. Moreover,
government entities are committed to protect the public interest of consumer or
individual traders which may not have the resources nor expertise of
institutional investors. This is true for the US CFTC and the British
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
In the US the CFTC has approved TrueEx exchange for Designated Contract
Marketplace (DCM) swaps. Brexit aside, the British FCA is seeking to
enforce the EU
Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD). The Cryptocurrency Academy
predicts that regulatory scrutiny for derivatives will not be resolved until
the more fundamental issues (e.g. the legitimacy of crypto assets as securities
or commodities are fully resolved in the coming 12-24 months. For now, we
recommend the individual traders take a cautious approach to derivatives. Post a comment today! Lawrence – Cryptocurrency
Academy (https://cryptocurrencyacademy.blogspot.com/)
Monday, November 19, 2018
Is there a Crypto Ruble Central Bank Digital Currency in Russia’s future?
Colleagues, central bankers around the world have commented
on the viability of a CDDC in their respective nations for the past 2-3 years.
The US Federal Reserve, PBoC, Bank of England, EBC and the State Bank of the Russian Federation have each weighed-in on this critical matter. Although the Cryptocurrency Academy does not want to handicap the odds and timetable for each
nation state this we do know: The central banks of many of the world’s largest
economics are seriously considering a CBDC. We have previously published posts
on the US Fed and the PBoC. More recently, we have seen Russia’s central
bankers prediction of a CBDC within the next 24-36 months. This forecast is
generally in line with the statements (and actions) of their peers in other
nations. Nevertheless, the BoE would appear to be in the lead with the PBoC
Closely behind. The US Fed is cautiously assessing the viability of a US CBDC;
however, major concerns over security and transparency remain. Not so with the
PBoC which is actively developing the infrastructure for a Chinese CBDC as is
the BoE. Russian officials state that future Crypto Ruble might even have
parity with the existing fiat Ruble. We hold fast to our own prognostication:
Within 2-3 years, these nations – along with Japan – are highly likely to
have launched or be in an advanced development and testing phase of CBDCs. Post a comment today! Lawrence – Cryptocurrency
Academy (https://cryptocurrencyacademy.blogspot.com/)
Friday, November 16, 2018
Will the enforcement of economic sanctions force crypto exchanges to purge Iranian traders?
Colleagues, Bittrex, BitMex and now Binance have banned Iranian
cryptocurrency traders in an effort to avoid penalties in the wake of US economic sanctions.
The exchanges issue a warning to users based in Iran to withdraw their funds or
face the confiscation of their assets. There are surely legitimate crypto
traders in the Persian state, however, the goal is to place an embargo on any
state-sponsored entities from circumventing US trade sanctions. Binance has
moved from China to Japan, while BitMex HQ is in Hong Kong and Bittrex is
located in the US. Exchanges, whether with large or modest trading volumes,
face penalties for aiding and abetting Iranian
actors from participating – even on the margins – in the global economy.
Will other crypto exchanges follow their lead? We believe the strategies of
other crypto platforms will depend on the rigor of direct or indirect US
penalties. Post a comment today! Lawrence – Cryptocurrency
Academy (https://cryptocurrencyacademy.blogspot.com/)
Thursday, November 15, 2018
Cryptocurrency Triple Play - How common are pyramid schemes similar to those in China, South Korea and Japan?
Colleagues, East Asia has become a hotbed for multi-level
marketing schemes which exploit the allure of and poor transparency of
cryptocurrencies, namely Bitcoin. Whether this past May in China
($47m) or more recently in South
Korea ($20m) and Japan
($68m), crypto fraud schemes are running rampant across the region. Bottom
line: Despite many efforts by credible members of the global crypto ecosystem,
digital such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple and others, are wrought with the
potential for scams and related cybercrimes. Government enforcement entities
such as China’s Ministry
of Public Security or the US SEC only have the bandwidth
to track and prosecute a small minority of crypto fraud cases. We do not
foresee a significant reduction in crypto cybercrimes until government agencies
have both the cyber tools and manpower to launch a counter-offensive which is
likely to be 2-3+ years in the future. Post a comment today! Lawrence – Cryptocurrency Academy (https://cryptocurrencyacademy.blogspot.com/)
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
Is Venezuela’s Petro a Viable Option to Become OPEC’s Oil-backed Cryptocurrency?
Colleagues, most readers will know
that Venezuela’s socialist government wants to circumvent US economic sanctions
by launching its Petro (PDVSA) cryptocurrency. This move would
provide the beleaguered government access to financial resources it so desperately
needs. The broader issue is whether OPEC
should adopt the Petro as its de facto digital currency for global crude oil
transactions among both first and third world nations. Venezuela ranks a
distant 6th place behind Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, the UAE and
Kuwait according to crude oil production data from Statista. The Cryptocurrency Academy predicts that OPEC will steer clear of “little Venice’s”
Petro as reported by Prensa Latina and instead adopt an oil-back
cryptocurrency sponsored by Saudi Arabia’s Aramco in mid-late 2019. We also
predict that a Saudi sponsored currency is likely – by design – to be far more
transparent than the Petro when it comes to tracking payments and transactions. Post a comment today! Lawrence – Cryptocurrency
Academy (https://cryptocurrencyacademy.blogspot.com/)
Thursday, November 8, 2018
What is the impact of the malicious JavaScript code injection into StatCounter’s URI among cryptocurrency exchanges?
Colleagues,
the world’s thirty-eight largest crypto exchange Gate.io was successfully
hacked via the injection of code into StatCounter’s
URI “myaccount/withdraw/BTC”. Reported by security
firm ESET WeLiveSecurity
indicated that although Gate.io is the only known crypto exchange effected, all
of StatCounter’s some 2 million customer sites are at risk. For readers with a
programming background the code was injected via the Dean Edwards JS packer in
the middle of the script. We assume that economic gain is the chief motive
although the ESET report did not provide corroborating details. This cyber-attack
raises two questions. First, how susceptible are URIs (uniform
resource identifiers) to injections via the Dean Edwards packer? And second, how
many more web sites which use StatCounter – a competitor to Google Analytics –
are effected? We will continue to research answers to both questions. Share a comment today! Lawrence – Cryptocurrency
Academy (https://cryptocurrencyacademy.blogspot.com/)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Colleagues, crypto time warp attacks occur when miners collude to report incorrect timestamps that are farther apart, messing with the ...
-
Crypto Traders, gain a competitive advantage in cryptocurrency and Bitcoin trading with three complementary programs. First, the Certified C...
-
Colleagues, we have written extensively about the CBDC initiatives underway in China (PBoC), US (US Federal Reserve) and the UK (Bank of...